Burger King Legal Issues
In July 2010, British regulators found an advertisement for Burger King`s Tendercrisp chicken sandwich misleading and ordered it in the field, the lawsuit says, citing a BBC report. The ban followed customer complaints about the size of the crispy tender and an investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority, which concluded: „The burgers in the hands of a medium-sized man. did not fill the hands to the same extent as the hamburger shown in the advertisement. In response to the perceived blasphemy, Akhtar said it was his personal jihad to find those responsible for the packaging and destroy their professional status, their personal lives and the UK as a whole because they have a culture that allows for insult.  This event, Akhtar`s reaction, and other similar problems with companies like Nike and Unilever have been used by conservative political critics such as James Joyner, who argue that Western nations and organizations bow too easily to Muslim claims or threats, and by commentators, including author Daniel C. Dennett, which highlights how factions of the Islamic faith tend towards iconoclasm.    Rob Wile is a last-minute reporter for NBC News Digital. Burger King`s legal issues include several lawsuits and lawsuits involving international fast food chain Burger King (BK) as plaintiff and defendant in the years following its inception in 1954. These have affected almost every aspect of the company`s operations. According to owners and executives at the time of these incidents, the company`s responses to these challenges ranged from conciliatory dialogue with its critics and litigants to more aggressive opposition with questionable tactics and negative consequences. The company`s response to these various problems has drawn praise, contempt and accusations of political appeasement from various parties over the years. In 2001, the animal rights group PETA began targeting the various fast food chains in the United States over issues of chicken processing by suppliers such as Tyson Foods. With parodies of company logos and slogans, the group has tried to publicly embarrass companies to change their corporate policies by dealing with poultry suppliers.
] Am 28. In June 2001, Burger King agreed with the group and established a contractual framework for its suppliers, establishing procedures to ensure that its suppliers meet agreed animal welfare standards. These changes, along with the company`s new vegetarian offering, the BK Veggie Sandwich, have been welcomed by the group.cite Press release |url=www.femail.com.au/murderking.htm |title=Burger King Responds to the demand for improved animal welfare standards. |author=PETA |publisher=Femail.com.au |date=2001-06-28 |accessdate=2008-03-09 |quote=The only way to avoid cruelty in meat production is to become vegetarian, but today Burger King has taken huge steps to improve the lives of millions of animals] [cite web |url=findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_12_36/ai_84237785 |title=PETA helps BK introduce vegetable-based burgers |work=Nation`s Restaurant News |date=2002-03-05 |accessdate=2008-03-09 |quote=Backed by former challenger PETA, the radical animal rights group Burger King Corp. began with the nationwide launch of the new BK vegetarian burger and the new reduced-fat mayonnaise.] In 2006, at its annual board meeting, PETA appeared before the board of directors of Burger King Holding to ask the company to switch to a more humane slaughter method called Controlled Atmosphere Killing (CAK) when preparing its poultry products. Using another approach that went beyond the conclusion that the process is more humane, the group claimed that the method was more economically viable for the company because it reduces the likelihood of injuries to workers in poultry plants and produces better products by preventing injuries to the animal. [cites web |url=www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/stories/2006/11/27/daily24.html?jst=b_ln_hl |title=PETA criticizes Burger King`s poultry decisions |work=South Florida Business Journal |date=2006-11-28 |accessdate=2008-03-09 |quote=People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said it would use its position as a shareholder of Burger King Holdings at Wednesday`s shareholder meeting to show its position on the company`s poultry practices. fast food.] In response to this new protest in March 2007, Burger King announced a series of additional changes to its animal welfare policies. In the policy change, BK announced that it would prefer chicken suppliers who use CAK instead of electric shocks to hit unconscious birds before slaughter. The company has added new guidelines requiring its pork and poultry suppliers to improve the living conditions of pigs and chickens. The rules require that two percent of North American egg suppliers use cageless eggs and 10 percent of pork suppliers use cageless pigs for their pork products.
PETA and the Humane Society of the United States said Burger King`s initiatives put it ahead of its competitors in terms of animal rights and welfare, and that they hope the new initiative will trigger reforms in the fast food industry.cite web |url=www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/business/28burger.html |title=Burger King Changes Policy on Animals |author=Andrew Martin |work=The New York Times |date=2007-03-28 | accessdate=2008-03-09 |quote=In what animal rights activists call „historic progress,” Burger King, the world`s second-largest burger chain, said yesterday that it would buy eggs and pork from suppliers who don`t lock their animals in cages and boxes.] cite news |url=www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,261903,00.html |title=Burger King offers cage-free food.